Just as a reminder: my gestalt real-time reviewing in the last ten years frequently turns into a streaming of images, themes and personal thoughts and appreciations of the fiction, i.e. not an academic study of each work based on its authorial history, social history etc. — and often I have not read any other reviews of each book nor any of its internal non-fiction notes, intros etc. I hope my reviewing is still proving to be of some provocative ‘aesthetic’ in its own right, together with cross-references of synchronicity to encourage cross-fertilisation of reading by others. Most feedback I’ve received so far is promising. Thanks for your patience and empathy.